<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="forum.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
		<title>Engineering Forum</title>
		<description>Latest discussion on water resource engineering software!</description>
		<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/</link>
		
<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maybe your well past this problem, but if you go back to hydraulics 101, the weir coifficient is some root of 1 over g or something, i will leave that to you to look up.  so for a  broadcrested wier C-standard = 3.09 and C-metric = 1.704; so C-standard x 0.55 = C-metric.  So your coefficient of C-metric = 1.11 is C-standard=2.0.   so in your problem, C-metric=0.61whatever is about C = 1.0 in standard, which is extremely low.   So C-metric = 1.11 is as conservatively low as you need to go.  

Have fun.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maybe your well past this problem, but if you go back to hydraulics 101, the weir coifficient is some root of 1 over g or something, i will leave that to you to look up.  so for a  broadcrested wier C-standard = 3.09 and C-metric = 1.704; so C-standard x 0.55 = C-metric.  So your coefficient of C-metric = 1.11 is C-standard=2.0.   so in your problem, C-metric=0.61whatever is about C = 1.0 in standard, which is extremely low.   So C-metric = 1.11 is as conservatively low as you need to go.   <br> <br>Have fun.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16089.html</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:22:53 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[[QUOTE=ateshome;38670]The Steady Flow analysis on the HEC RAS model I am working on run successfully.  However, numerous warning messages were generated.  the following are among the messages.  What should I look at to address these warning?

1.  Conveyance ratio is either less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4, this may indicate a need for additional XS
2. The Velocity Head has changed by more than 0.5ft. this may indicate a need for additional XS
3.The Energy loss was greater that 1.0 ft between current and previous XS, this may indicate a need for additional XS
...

P.S.   I have added new XS at the RS where the warnings are fired off, but that didn't address the warning
thanks[/QUOTE]
Thanks, the warnings show uo at all bridges, but also show up at other regular XS.  I will try interpolating more XS in between.

thanks]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[[QUOTE=ateshome;38670]The Steady Flow analysis on the HEC RAS model I am working on run successfully.  However, numerous warning messages were generated.  the following are among the messages.  What should I look at to address these warning? <br> <br>1.  Conveyance ratio is either less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4, this may indicate a need for additional XS <br>2. The Velocity Head has changed by more than 0.5ft. this may indicate a need for additional XS <br>3.The Energy loss was greater that 1.0 ft between current and previous XS, this may indicate a need for additional XS <br>... <br> <br>P.S.   I have added new XS at the RS where the warnings are fired off, but that didn't address the warning <br>thanks[/QUOTE] <br>Thanks, the warnings show uo at all bridges, but also show up at other regular XS.  I will try interpolating more XS in between. <br> <br>thanks]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16186.html</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:23:34 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[Are you getting these messages at a bridge/culvert?  Many bridges get these messages and it isn't usually a problem.  (Or, it isn't a problem unless you are required to eliminate all warnings--it would have been better if RAS showed them as notes).

If it is just regular cross sections, intepolating enough cross sections will usually fix the problem (unless there is something more serious going on).]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Are you getting these messages at a bridge/culvert?  Many bridges get these messages and it isn't usually a problem.  (Or, it isn't a problem unless you are required to eliminate all warnings--it would have been better if RAS showed them as notes). <br> <br>If it is just regular cross sections, intepolating enough cross sections will usually fix the problem (unless there is something more serious going on).]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16186.html</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:33:37 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[Another option is you could model your culvert as a series of cross sections with lids.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Another option is you could model your culvert as a series of cross sections with lids.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16185.html</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:29:27 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[It looks like that is what I need to do.  I tried making a section just upstream and downstream of my box so it would interpolate the stream bed the way I wanted it, but it didnt do it exactly correct.  Thanks for your help.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It looks like that is what I need to do.  I tried making a section just upstream and downstream of my box so it would interpolate the stream bed the way I wanted it, but it didnt do it exactly correct.  Thanks for your help.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16185.html</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:23:43 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[I get this warning:"Momentum answer is not valid if the water surface is above the low chord or or if there is weir flow. The momentum answer has been disregarded"
So the method used is "Energy only". 
Thanks for you reply]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I get this warning:"Momentum answer is not valid if the water surface is above the low chord or or if there is weir flow. The momentum answer has been disregarded" <br>So the method used is "Energy only".  <br>Thanks for you reply]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16184.html</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:54:43 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PCSWMM Observed times series file</title>
<description><![CDATA[Hello, 

I am having some problems with the observed file. I am trying to calibrate some parameter with SRTC, but when I open my tsf with the observed inlow the program does not read it. I can open but the graph is empty, with no values. 

The file is attached, I really apreciate if someone could help me. 

Thanks

Milena Collodel]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello,  <br> <br>I am having some problems with the observed file. I am trying to calibrate some parameter with SRTC, but when I open my tsf with the observed inlow the program does not read it. I can open but the graph is empty, with no values.  <br> <br>The file is attached, I really apreciate if someone could help me.  <br> <br>Thanks <br> <br>Milena Collodel]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16187.html</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:52:46 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I think you are going to be stuck with working with Method 1 and supplying the encroachment stations yourself.  It certainly will be tedious, but you can get the floodway exactly where you want it.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I think you are going to be stuck with working with Method 1 and supplying the encroachment stations yourself.  It certainly will be tedious, but you can get the floodway exactly where you want it.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16182.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:13:54 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[You may need to increase your minimum and initial flows to make sure that the junctions are not dry at the beginning of the simulation.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You may need to increase your minimum and initial flows to make sure that the junctions are not dry at the beginning of the simulation.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16174.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:06:32 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[You are modeling your culvert as a bridge and you want to change the the bottom shape inside of the bridge/culvert?

If so, from the bridge editor, click on Options and select "Internal Bridge Cross Sections"]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You are modeling your culvert as a bridge and you want to change the the bottom shape inside of the bridge/culvert? <br> <br>If so, from the bridge editor, click on Options and select "Internal Bridge Cross Sections"]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16185.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:40:58 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[The bridge method that RAS defaulted to may be lower than the maximum low chord, but that doesn't mean that the momentum method didn't hit the low chord.  There are also other reasons that RAS may disregard the momentum method.

Go to the bridge specific output table and look at the bottom.  Are there any warnings, such as, "for the final momentum answer, the upstream energy was lower than the downstream energy...."]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The bridge method that RAS defaulted to may be lower than the maximum low chord, but that doesn't mean that the momentum method didn't hit the low chord.  There are also other reasons that RAS may disregard the momentum method. <br> <br>Go to the bridge specific output table and look at the bottom.  Are there any warnings, such as, "for the final momentum answer, the upstream energy was lower than the downstream energy...."]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16184.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:37:39 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>HEC RAS Warning and Notes</title>
<description><![CDATA[The Steady Flow analysis on the HEC RAS model I am working on run successfully.  However, numerous warning messages were generated.  the following are among the messages.  What should I look at to address these warning?

1.  Conveyance ratio is either less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4, this may indicate a need for additional XS
2. The Velocity Head has changed by more than 0.5ft. this may indicate a need for additional XS
3.The Energy loss was greater that 1.0 ft between current and previous XS, this may indicate a need for additional XS
...

P.S.   I have added new XS at the RS where the warnings are fired off, but that didn't address the warning
thanks]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Steady Flow analysis on the HEC RAS model I am working on run successfully.  However, numerous warning messages were generated.  the following are among the messages.  What should I look at to address these warning? <br> <br>1.  Conveyance ratio is either less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4, this may indicate a need for additional XS <br>2. The Velocity Head has changed by more than 0.5ft. this may indicate a need for additional XS <br>3.The Energy loss was greater that 1.0 ft between current and previous XS, this may indicate a need for additional XS <br>... <br> <br>P.S.   I have added new XS at the RS where the warnings are fired off, but that didn't address the warning <br>thanks]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16186.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:37:04 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Modeling a 3 sided box culvert</title>
<description><![CDATA[I am trying to model a 3 sided box culvert in which the natural stream bed will retain its shape, but may be lowered to provide a no rise situation for the floodway.  I have entered my high and low chord data to define my box (instead of using the culvert editor).  This is fine if I do not wish to alter the stream bed in any way, but I want to lower the embankments some to provide additional flow. If I am correct, the stream bed is just interpolated through the box that I have defined using the Bridge Deck/Roadway editor so there is no way I can see to alter the stream bed through my box.  How do I do this?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am trying to model a 3 sided box culvert in which the natural stream bed will retain its shape, but may be lowered to provide a no rise situation for the floodway.  I have entered my high and low chord data to define my box (instead of using the culvert editor).  This is fine if I do not wish to alter the stream bed in any way, but I want to lower the embankments some to provide additional flow. If I am correct, the stream bed is just interpolated through the box that I have defined using the Bridge Deck/Roadway editor so there is no way I can see to alter the stream bed through my box.  How do I do this?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16185.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:06:00 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Modeling arch bridges</title>
<description><![CDATA[Why HEC-RAS disregards the momentum answer, even though neither EG line or water surface are above the maximum low chord? This happens when dealing with arch bridges. I tried also to model the bridge with a straight low chord and piles with increasing width, to simulate the bridge arches, but the answer is the same.
Thanks if someone can help me.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why HEC-RAS disregards the momentum answer, even though neither EG line or water surface are above the maximum low chord? This happens when dealing with arch bridges. I tried also to model the bridge with a straight low chord and piles with increasing width, to simulate the bridge arches, but the answer is the same. <br>Thanks if someone can help me.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16184.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:13:33 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[After pasting into MS Word, select all of the text (press Ctrl-A to select All) and then change the font to a fixed spaced font, such as Courier or New Courier. You may need to change the font size to 8 pt (or smaller) or change the page orientation from portrait to landscape in order for some of the tables to fit on a page without word wrapping.

You should find that the report will now be very presentable.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[After pasting into MS Word, select all of the text (press Ctrl-A to select All) and then change the font to a fixed spaced font, such as Courier or New Courier. You may need to change the font size to 8 pt (or smaller) or change the page orientation from portrait to landscape in order for some of the tables to fit on a page without word wrapping. <br> <br>You should find that the report will now be very presentable.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16183.html</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:59:45 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Exporting Text Output</title>
<description><![CDATA[Hi All

Does anyone have any tips on exporting or copying the text output files into Word and have it appear in an orderly manner?  I find that when the text is transfered things become jumbled due to the use of spaces instead of tabs.  Really, I just want to have things appear a bit normal without having to go through and manually edit every line to get an acceptable appearance.  Thanks!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi All <br> <br>Does anyone have any tips on exporting or copying the text output files into Word and have it appear in an orderly manner?  I find that when the text is transfered things become jumbled due to the use of spaces instead of tabs.  Really, I just want to have things appear a bit normal without having to go through and manually edit every line to get an acceptable appearance.  Thanks!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16183.html</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:02:18 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Encroachments - Specify Left and Let HEC-RAS Calulate Right</title>
<description><![CDATA[I am doing a floodway analysis and i was wondering if there was any way to specify either the left or right encroachment and to let ras calculate the opposite encroachment using method 4 (specify water level increase).  

I have run method 4 on all of my cross-sections using equal conveyance reduction and propotional conveyance reduction and am not happy with the floodway it produces.

For example: 
I have a section where the channel almost runs up against the left valley wall.  The method 4 encroachment specifies a large encroachment along the right floodplain but not all the way to the channel and a small encroachment on the left side.  I would like to force hec ras to continue encroaching on the right floodplain before encroaching on the left. 

Thanks]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am doing a floodway analysis and i was wondering if there was any way to specify either the left or right encroachment and to let ras calculate the opposite encroachment using method 4 (specify water level increase).   <br> <br>I have run method 4 on all of my cross-sections using equal conveyance reduction and propotional conveyance reduction and am not happy with the floodway it produces. <br> <br>For example:  <br>I have a section where the channel almost runs up against the left valley wall.  The method 4 encroachment specifies a large encroachment along the right floodplain but not all the way to the channel and a small encroachment on the left side.  I would like to force hec ras to continue encroaching on the right floodplain before encroaching on the left.  <br> <br>Thanks]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16182.html</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:06:28 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[Can any one Explain  EPANET ? What is the features and  how to use ?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Can any one Explain  EPANET ? What is the features and  how to use ?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/10909.html</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:59:29 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[I've experimented with the approach of making a restart file by starting with a high tailwater and gradually lowering it down.  I've not had a lot of luck with that approach, but I know that some users have.  I think you need to lower things really slowly.

After you have created a restart file, you can't change the geometry.  So if you are trying to create a restart file, leave all the structures in place.

However, you may not really need a restart file.  Stability problems can be tricky, especially for new users.  If you fix underlying problems, you may find that you don't need a restart file at all.

When trying to build a stable model, I generally leave the structures in.  If I was going to remove structures, I would probably remove lateral structures before bridges/culverts.  For a large data set, I will sometimes remove a large chunk and work on a smaller section--for instance, the downstream most section.

Unless the channels are huge, 2500 cfs for an area that is normally dry sounds rather high.  You might want to investigate "pilot channels" to see if you can use a smaller base flow.  30 min time step also sounds on the large side, unless it is a fairly large, sluggish system.  If reducing the time step significantly changes the results (or causes its own stability issues) then the time step is probably too large.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I've experimented with the approach of making a restart file by starting with a high tailwater and gradually lowering it down.  I've not had a lot of luck with that approach, but I know that some users have.  I think you need to lower things really slowly. <br> <br>After you have created a restart file, you can't change the geometry.  So if you are trying to create a restart file, leave all the structures in place. <br> <br>However, you may not really need a restart file.  Stability problems can be tricky, especially for new users.  If you fix underlying problems, you may find that you don't need a restart file at all. <br> <br>When trying to build a stable model, I generally leave the structures in.  If I was going to remove structures, I would probably remove lateral structures before bridges/culverts.  For a large data set, I will sometimes remove a large chunk and work on a smaller section--for instance, the downstream most section. <br> <br>Unless the channels are huge, 2500 cfs for an area that is normally dry sounds rather high.  You might want to investigate "pilot channels" to see if you can use a smaller base flow.  30 min time step also sounds on the large side, unless it is a fairly large, sluggish system.  If reducing the time step significantly changes the results (or causes its own stability issues) then the time step is probably too large.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16180.html</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:57:18 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Rr</title>
<description><![CDATA[Hi  mates

I am new user for Hecras 4. I am in stuck in entering data in  " Steady Flow Data " . In that Window, under profile names and Flow rates, How we can change PF#1, PF#2 and PF#3 to 10 yr, 50Yr and 100 yr. Also what about the flow rates. How we  get flows for these events. I will appreciate much much for for yours help.

Thanks]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi  mates <br> <br>I am new user for Hecras 4. I am in stuck in entering data in  " Steady Flow Data " . In that Window, under profile names and Flow rates, How we can change PF#1, PF#2 and PF#3 to 10 yr, 50Yr and 100 yr. Also what about the flow rates. How we  get flows for these events. I will appreciate much much for for yours help. <br> <br>Thanks]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.bossintl.com/forums/showthread/s/1/threadid/16181.html</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 11:33:24 -0700</pubDate>
</item>

 
</channel>

</rss>
